Relating the concept of ‘knowledge’ with cultural context and ‘identity’

Knowledge under symbol processing view is perceived as a commodity that is created, developed and influenced by a stable and objective context. Several cultural legacies, beliefs and traditions, constitute what could be considered as valuable knowledge, what it means to be an educated person, who could be characterized as ‘intelligent’, etc.
Daily knowledge is considered insignificant and mundane, while the process of ‘acquiring knowledge’ is understood as a movement from ignorance to knowledge, from childhood to adolescence, from the insignificant to the exceptional. Inevitably, this assumption undermines the kind of knowledge that is created from/within daily life and experience and overestimates that kind of knowledge that is offered in formal institutions. Under this perspective, knowledge is inevitably divided into two separate processes: the creation and application process.
In contrast, under sociocultural ideas, the ‘knower’ and the ‘novice’ are not polarized but are both on trajectories of evolving competence, constructing and transforming their identities by participating in ongoing social activities. Learning is not a movement towards what is considered valuable (socially or culturally) but a process of becoming a member of a certain community, ‘taking part’ and ‘being a part’ of a greater whole.

The cultural context is influential, rich and multifarious. Under sociocultural perspective, the phrase ‘knowledgeable person’ is replaced by the phrase ‘developing an identity’. 


 

Knowledge under symbol processing view of mind


Knowledge under situated view of mind

Relating views of Cultural context and theories of knowledge/knowing

Comments