Below, I’ll
present two actions (that I’m already familiar with) of sharing learning by
focusing on those features that I can improve, change or do differently.
Action A: creating small, non-hierarchical, working groups on the occasion of a project.
Action A: creating small, non-hierarchical, working groups on the occasion of a project.
As I have
already mentioned, I work mostly as a freelancer (architect, designer,
educator, author) collaborating occasionally with other freelancers for a
shorter or longer period of time and in various working environments. In order
to improve the processes of sharing learning and extract the best from these
communities I decided to modify two essential features.
Firstly, I realized that I can change the composition of my working teams. Until now my teams were created
with participants, who were practicing the same professional activity (they
were either architects or artists). Consequently the possibilities for sharing
learning were predictable, conventional and unsurprising. However, people learn
from a diverse range of other people and that gave me the idea that I could
flavor further my working teams, by starting cooperating with more diverse
professionals from other disciplines (engineers, graphic designers, architects,
physiologists, etc).
Secondly, I
realized that I can expand the
boundaries of my working teams, by starting collaborating with people that
are outside my living and working environment. Until now my teams were created
with participants, who were belonging to a limited context. However the ideas
of possible “cognitive traps” made me realize that this practice (the exclusive
collaboration with friends and colleagues) resulted into the formation of
narrow working groups with limited developmental opportunities and under fixed
hierarchical structures. Thus, on the occasion of a next project I would
attempt to make an open call to several stakeholders and try to bring together
“unknown” participants, who would be keen to share their knowledge and
experiences under a communal target.
Action B: creating a virtual
learning community
While, I own
and administrate a popular internet site, for designers and architects,
nevertheless the current opportunities for participation and involvement are
limited. Inspired by the ideas about the expanding possibilities of the
internet and in an attempt to convert this site into a vivid learning community
I decided to change some essential features.
Firstly, I
realized that I can encourage further participation and involvement by
allowing other professionals to upload and present publicly their written
thoughts, images, projects, articles etc. Secondly, I decided to supplement the
site by adding a forum, where all
members (me, other professionals, students, amateurs, etc) would be freely
allowed to communicate and interact with each other. Contrasting, the above actions for sharing
learning (working team + virtual learning community), I would note that the
first is limited both to the number of participants and to narrow geographical
boundaries while the second is not.
Concluding,
I would highlight that the personal role I would like to undertake in these
communities, would be the role of the mediator, organizer, encourager, etc, and
not the role of a typical knowledge provider.
Comments
Post a Comment