The
term ‘evidence-based practice’, applied in education, refers to an educational
practice that is constantly updated by the results of a thorough research on
‘what works’ in the class. Moreover it refers to a model of relationship
between research, policy making and practice that it’s not a linear one,
starting from educational research and ending to the dissemination of the evidences
into practice, but to a cyclic model, in which the practice interacts and
cooperates constantly with the research.
According
to the model of evidence-based practice the researchers focus on a problem
until it gets a solution and produce research findings that are always based on
previous and tested ones. In this way the whole process results to the creation
of a cumulative and constantly improved theory, with practical application for
the practitioners.
Although,
the model seems simple, provisional and advantageous however it accepts
multiple interpretations by the stakeholders. On the one hand there are those
who believe that the research findings and evidences are valuable, useful and
can enrich the teacher’s wisdom without displacing it. On the other hand there
are those who afraid that such a “positivistic” model will encourage the policy
makers to intervene to the educational practice imposing strict rules and
replacing the teachers’ judgment. Furthermore, the negative criticism
highlights weaknesses of the model such as: That leads the interest of the
researchers exclusively on the measurable educational outcomes, that endeavors
the creation of universal theories underestimating the case studies, that
favors policies with short-term goals, that is inefficient to complex problems
etc.
The
diagram describes the function of ‘evidence-based practice’ and the way it could
be applied in education.
Comments
Post a Comment